xFURIOSOx
11-05-2004, 02:14 PM
ok this may sound downright outlandish but check it;
im beginnin to speculate if Saddam is actually an agent planted by the US. though i've actually heard this accusation before (check one of MAK's posts in the Bush/Kerry thread), when i thought about it, it did kinda add up in some ways. ill explain...
so we put this guy in power to keep tabs on the situation there, then we supply him with weaponry to go to war with Iran, etc. and then he gasses the Kurds while we purposely dont come to their aid to begin fabricating the whole "Saddam is a tyrant" sentiment. this would also most likely mean that what happened in Kuwait was a carefully planned action to further enforce this image of him being tyrannical, and could also explain why we didnt simply execute him when we found him (if not to make us seem more fair and just).
so what would we get out of this hypothetical situation? oil and location; we now basically have a new oil pipeline which would be economically beneficial to us, and we now have a sort of forward staging ground for any further action in the middle east. all thanks to our agent posing as a 'threat to the free world', though im sure the government didnt count on the rest of the world being against our actions...
now tha little evidence that does back up this claim is that the US has been known to do things like this. theyve been sending agents to various countries around the world for sometime now to sort of keep tabs on things and what not. also when you think about it, as crazy as it sounds in some ways it does make sense.
but as i said this is pretty much pure speculation. so if you got any opinions on this, drop em here. ~1~
im beginnin to speculate if Saddam is actually an agent planted by the US. though i've actually heard this accusation before (check one of MAK's posts in the Bush/Kerry thread), when i thought about it, it did kinda add up in some ways. ill explain...
so we put this guy in power to keep tabs on the situation there, then we supply him with weaponry to go to war with Iran, etc. and then he gasses the Kurds while we purposely dont come to their aid to begin fabricating the whole "Saddam is a tyrant" sentiment. this would also most likely mean that what happened in Kuwait was a carefully planned action to further enforce this image of him being tyrannical, and could also explain why we didnt simply execute him when we found him (if not to make us seem more fair and just).
so what would we get out of this hypothetical situation? oil and location; we now basically have a new oil pipeline which would be economically beneficial to us, and we now have a sort of forward staging ground for any further action in the middle east. all thanks to our agent posing as a 'threat to the free world', though im sure the government didnt count on the rest of the world being against our actions...
now tha little evidence that does back up this claim is that the US has been known to do things like this. theyve been sending agents to various countries around the world for sometime now to sort of keep tabs on things and what not. also when you think about it, as crazy as it sounds in some ways it does make sense.
but as i said this is pretty much pure speculation. so if you got any opinions on this, drop em here. ~1~